🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on parliament to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," stated one MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering disturbing platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state government level amid national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to follow the Australian path, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.