🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has evolved since that time, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.